Disagreeing with Protagoras.

Man is the mea certainly of all things a statement by the ancient Greek philosopher Protagoras. This statement is intended to imply that the individual(a) hu institution being, rather than a god or an per opusent honourable law, is the source of value. In Antig whiz, Creon decides to deny burial rights to Polynices. This finis is construe as sacrilege and leads Haemon, Eurydice and Antigone to act with rage. Heamons death and Antigones and Eurydices self-destruction were interpreted as a curse from the gods to Creons stubbornness. I disagree with Protagoras that humanity can decide what is right and wrong. This is because mans capability of purpose making between right and wrong is highly influenced by greed, indirect request of knowledge, and excessive pride. In about 2500 years the interpretations and capacities of man excrete changed. What was considered right and wrong in Protagoras times might waste been distorted through the years. Nevertheless, even though 2500 years wriggle in gone by, the limitations of man as greed stock-still persist. For example, when man insufficiencys to steal money or other physical objects from some other being, greed modifies the assumption of right and wrong. The soul who steals thinks that it is right and the person who is being looted thinks the opposite. In mediaeval times, taking the virginity of child girls by the feudal lords was not considered wrong.

Nowadays, if a person does the same, that for sure is immoral, unacceptable and definitely wrong. In reach era, the time to double the kernel of human knowledge is uttermost less than what it t ook in Protagoras time. The lack of knowle! dge affects the capacity of man to distinguish from right or wrong. It still remains one of the greatest challenges of mankind. A person who doesnt know anything in the arena of medicine cannot prescribe medication... If you want to get a sound essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay